linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009140738570.24617@felia>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:39:40 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
cc:     Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
        Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks
 consistent



On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:

> Commit 637cfacae96f ("PCI: mediatek: Add MediaTek PCIe host controller
> support") does not mention that linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org is
> moderated for non-subscribers, but the other eight entries for
> linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org do.
> 
> Adjust this entry to be consistent with all others.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> ---
> applies cleanly on v5.9-rc5 and next-20200911
> 
> Ryder, please ack.
> 
> Bjorn, Matthias, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> 
> This patch submission will also show me if linux-mediatek is moderated or
> not. I have not subscribed to linux-mediatek and if it shows up quickly in
> the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer, it
> is moderated, and hence, validating the patch.
> 

Okay, my patch showed up within seconds in the archive:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/


I think the linux-mediatek list is actually NOT _moderated for 
non-subscribers_.

Please IGNORE this patch until someone can confirm if it is moderated or 
not. I will then send the patch that reflects the actual state.

Thanks, Lukas