linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: spi-nor: cleanup common code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d52e1bdbbefc9383904e28bcc1c78a7@walle.cc>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:09:33 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Pratyush Yadav <me@...avpratyush.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: spi-nor: cleanup common code

Hi Pratyush,

Am 2020-09-14 11:40, schrieb Pratyush Yadav:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> *sigh* This patch will cause a _lot_ of conflicts with my series [0]. 
> It
> should hopefully go in the next merge window so maybe you can rebase on
> top of it? Dunno.

Could you pick up this patch in some form in your series? It looks like 
your
series touches most/some of the functions. The patch just removes code
repetitions.
TBH I don't need this patch as I just can implement my new one-byte 
command
using the current "if (nor->spimem) {} else {}" pattern.

-michael