[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b47a0e17-5006-9479-42db-ce52a6e358a4@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:33:19 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, git <git@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] PCI/portdrv: Only disable Bus Master on kexec
reboot and connected PCI devices
On 09/14/2020 08:06 PM, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
> Hello Tiezhu
>
> 在 2020/9/14 下午7:24, Tiezhu Yang 写道:
>> On 09/14/2020 05:46 PM, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>> Hi, Tiezhu,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:30 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 09/14/2020 04:52 PM, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Tiezhu,
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you test kexec? kexec -e or systemctl kexec? Or both?
>>>> kexec -l vmlinux --append="root=/dev/sda2 console=ttyS0,115200"
>>>> kexec -e
>>> So you haven't tested "systemctl kexec"?
>>
>> Yes, the distro I used is Loongnix which has not kexec service now.
>> Is there any problem when use systemctl kexec? If you have more details,
>> please let me know.
>>
>
> It is inevitable that there will be some omissions during testing.
> This is understandable, but what I am more curious about is why you
> send the patch that Huacai has already sent every time. Why not
> strengthen communication with Huacai and avoid duplication of work?
Oh, maybe there exists some misunderstanding, let me explain it.
when I update the latest kernel, the shutdown or reboot failed, I debug it
and try to solve it, then I sent a RFC patch.
I notice that there exists a similar patch by Huacai until Bjorn Helgaas cc
Huacai's patch to me. Because I have a different thought, so I sent RFC v2
and v3.
I think cc the related people at first can avoid this case.
>
>
>>>
>>> Huacai
>>>>> P.S., Please also CC my gmail (chenhuacai@...il.com) since lemote.com
>>>>> has some communication problems.
>>>> OK, no problem.
>>>>
>>>>> Huacai
>>>>>
>>>>>> 陈华才江苏航天龙梦信息技术有限公司/研发中心/软件部 ------------------
>>>>>> Original ------------------From: "Tiezhu
>>>>>> Yang"<yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>;Date: Mon, Sep 14, 2020 03:57
>>>>>> PMTo: "Bjorn Helgaas"<bhelgaas@...gle.com>; Cc:
>>>>>> "linux-pci"<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>;
>>>>>> "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; "Rafael J.
>>>>>> Wysocki"<rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; "Konstantin
>>>>>> Khlebnikov"<khlebnikov@...nvz.org>; "Khalid
>>>>>> Aziz"<khalid.aziz@...cle.com>; "Vivek Goyal"<vgoyal@...hat.com>;
>>>>>> "Lukas Wunner"<lukas@...ner.de>; "Oliver
>>>>>> O'Halloran"<oohall@...il.com>; "Huacai Chen"<chenhc@...ote.com>;
>>>>>> "Jiaxun Yang"<jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>; "Xuefeng
>>>>>> Li"<lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>; Subject: [RFC PATCH v3] PCI/portdrv:
>>>>>> Only disable Bus Master on kexec reboot and connected PCI devices
>>>>>> After commit 745be2e700cd ("PCIe: portdrv: call pci_disable_device
>>>>>> during remove") and commit cc27b735ad3a ("PCI/portdrv: Turn off PCIe
>>>>>> services during shutdown"), it also calls pci_disable_device()
>>>>>> during
>>>>>> shutdown, this leads to shutdown or reboot failure occasionally
>>>>>> due to
>>>>>> clear PCI_COMMAND_MASTER on the device in do_pci_disable_device().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drivers/pci/pci.c
>>>>>> static void do_pci_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> u16 pci_command;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &pci_command);
>>>>>> if (pci_command & PCI_COMMAND_MASTER) {
>>>>>> pci_command &= ~PCI_COMMAND_MASTER;
>>>>>> pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND,
>>>>>> pci_command);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pcibios_disable_device(dev);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When remove "pci_command &= ~PCI_COMMAND_MASTER;", it can work
>>>>>> well when
>>>>>> shutdown or reboot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Oliver O'Halloran said, no need to call pci_disable_device() when
>>>>>> actually shutting down, but we should call pci_disable_device()
>>>>>> before
>>>>>> handing over to the new kernel on kexec reboot, so we can do some
>>>>>> condition checks which are already executed afterwards by the
>>>>>> function
>>>>>> pci_device_shutdown(), this is done by commit 4fc9bbf98fd6 ("PCI:
>>>>>> Disable
>>>>>> Bus Master only on kexec reboot") and commit 6e0eda3c3898 ("PCI:
>>>>>> Don't try
>>>>>> to disable Bus Master on disconnected PCI devices").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>>>> static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> if (drv && drv->shutdown)
>>>>>> drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /*
>>>>>> * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit
>>>>>> on the
>>>>>> * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't
>>>>>> touch
>>>>>> * devices in D3cold or unknown states.
>>>>>> * If it is not a kexec reboot, firmware will hit the PCI
>>>>>> * devices with big hammer and stop their DMA any way.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> if (kexec_in_progress && (pci_dev->current_state <=
>>>>>> PCI_D3hot))
>>>>>> pci_clear_master(pci_dev);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ 36.159446] Call Trace:
>>>>>> [ 36.241688] [<ffffffff80211434>] show_stack+0x9c/0x130
>>>>>> [ 36.326619] [<ffffffff80661b70>] dump_stack+0xb0/0xf0
>>>>>> [ 36.410403] [<ffffffff806a8240>] pcie_portdrv_shutdown+0x18/0x78
>>>>>> [ 36.495302] [<ffffffff8069c6b4>] pci_device_shutdown+0x44/0x90
>>>>>> [ 36.580027] [<ffffffff807aac90>] device_shutdown+0x130/0x290
>>>>>> [ 36.664486] [<ffffffff80265448>] kernel_power_off+0x38/0x80
>>>>>> [ 36.748272] [<ffffffff80265634>] __do_sys_reboot+0x1a4/0x258
>>>>>> [ 36.831985] [<ffffffff80218b90>] syscall_common+0x34/0x58
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 1 -
>>>>>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>>>>>> index 50a9522..1991aca 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>>>>>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ void pcie_port_device_remove(struct pci_dev
>>>>>> *dev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> device_for_each_child(&dev->dev, NULL, remove_iter);
>>>>>> pci_free_irq_vectors(dev);
>>>>>> - pci_disable_device(dev);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>>>>>> index 3a3ce40..cab37a8 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
>>>>>> @@ -143,6 +143,18 @@ static void pcie_portdrv_remove(struct
>>>>>> pci_dev *dev)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pcie_port_device_remove(dev);
>>>>>> + pci_disable_device(dev);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static void pcie_portdrv_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + if (pci_bridge_d3_possible(dev)) {
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_forbid(&dev->dev);
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&dev->dev);
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&dev->dev);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pcie_port_device_remove(dev);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static pci_ers_result_t pcie_portdrv_error_detected(struct
>>>>>> pci_dev *dev,
>>>>>> @@ -211,7 +223,7 @@ static struct pci_driver pcie_portdriver = {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .probe = pcie_portdrv_probe,
>>>>>> .remove = pcie_portdrv_remove,
>>>>>> - .shutdown = pcie_portdrv_remove,
>>>>>> + .shutdown = pcie_portdrv_shutdown,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .err_handler = &pcie_portdrv_err_handler,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists