linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:11:21 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
        Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent



On 14/09/2020 12:20, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 14/09/2020 07:31, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>>> Commit 637cfacae96f ("PCI: mediatek: Add MediaTek PCIe host controller
>>> support") does not mention that linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org is
>>> moderated for non-subscribers, but the other eight entries for
>>> linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org do.
>>>
>>> Adjust this entry to be consistent with all others.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
>>
>> Maybe rephrase the commit message to something like:
>> "Mark linux-mediatek@...ts.infraded.org as moderated for the MediaTek PCIe
>> host controller entry, as the list actually is moderated."
>>
>> Anyway:
>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>> applies cleanly on v5.9-rc5 and next-20200911
>>>
>>> Ryder, please ack.
>>>
>>> Bjorn, Matthias, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
>>>
>>> This patch submission will also show me if linux-mediatek is moderated or
>>> not. I have not subscribed to linux-mediatek and if it shows up quickly in
>>> the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer, it
>>> is moderated, and hence, validating the patch.
>>
>> I can affirm the list is moderated :)
>>
> 
> Hmm, do we mean the same "moderation" here?
> 
> I believe a mailing list with the remark "moderated for non-subscribers"
> means that a mail from an address that has not subscribed to the mailing
> list is put on hold and needs to be manually permitted to be seen on the
> mailing list.
> 
> Matthias, is that also your understanding of "moderated for
> non-subscribers" for your Reviewed-by tag?

Yes.

> 
> I am not subscribed to linux-mediatek. When I sent an email to the list,
> it showed up really seconds later in the lore.kernel.org of the
> linux-mediatek public-inbox repository. So, either it was delivered
> quickly as it is not moderated or my check with lore.kernel.org is wrong,
> e.g., mails show up in the lore.kernel.org archive, even they were not
> yet permitted on the actual list.
> 

I'm the moderator and I get requests to moderate emails. I suppose I added you 
to the accepted list because of earlier emails you send.

Regards,
Matthias