[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200914133939.GG2236@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:39:39 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 03/15] devlink: Add reload action stats
Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:50AM CEST, moshe@...lanox.com wrote:
>Add reload action stats to hold the history per reload action type and
>limit level.
Empty line missing.
>For example, the number of times fw_activate has been performed on this
>device since the driver module was added or if the firmware activation
>was performed with or without reset.
>Add devlink notification on stats update.
>
>The function devlink_reload_actions_implicit_actions_performed() is
>exported to enable also drivers update on reload actions performed,
>for example in case firmware activation with reset finished
>successfully but was initiated by remote host.
>
>Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
>---
>v3 -> v4:
>- Renamed reload_actions_cnts to reload_action_stats
>- Add devlink notifications on stats update
>- Renamed devlink_reload_actions_implicit_actions_performed() and add
> function comment in code
>v2 -> v3:
>- New patch
>---
> include/net/devlink.h | 7 ++++++
> net/core/devlink.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>index dddd9ee5b8a9..b4feb92e0269 100644
>--- a/include/net/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
> #include <uapi/linux/devlink.h>
> #include <linux/xarray.h>
>
>+#define DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_STATS_ARRAY_SIZE \
>+ (__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX)
>+
> struct devlink_ops;
>
> struct devlink {
>@@ -38,6 +41,7 @@ struct devlink {
> struct list_head trap_policer_list;
> const struct devlink_ops *ops;
> struct xarray snapshot_ids;
>+ u32 reload_action_stats[DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_STATS_ARRAY_SIZE];
> struct device *dev;
> possible_net_t _net;
> struct mutex lock; /* Serializes access to devlink instance specific objects such as
>@@ -1397,6 +1401,9 @@ void
> devlink_health_reporter_recovery_done(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter);
>
> bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink);
>+void devlink_reload_implicit_actions_performed(struct devlink *devlink,
>+ enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>+ unsigned long actions_performed);
>
> void devlink_flash_update_begin_notify(struct devlink *devlink);
> void devlink_flash_update_end_notify(struct devlink *devlink);
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index 60aa0c4a3726..cbf746966913 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -2981,11 +2981,58 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
>
>+static void
>+devlink_reload_action_stats_update(struct devlink *devlink,
>+ enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>+ unsigned long actions_performed)
>+{
>+ int stat_idx;
>+ int action;
>+
>+ if (!actions_performed)
>+ return;
>+
>+ if (WARN_ON(limit_level > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_MAX))
>+ return;
>+ for (action = 0; action <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; action++) {
>+ if (!test_bit(action, &actions_performed))
>+ continue;
>+ stat_idx = limit_level * __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX + action;
>+ devlink->reload_action_stats[stat_idx]++;
>+ }
>+ devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW);
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * devlink_reload_implicit_actions_performed - Update devlink on reload actions
>+ * performed which are not a direct result of devlink reload call.
>+ *
>+ * This should be called by a driver after performing reload actions in case it was not
>+ * a result of devlink reload call. For example fw_activate was performed as a result
>+ * of devlink reload triggered fw_activate on another host.
>+ * The motivation for this function is to keep data on reload actions performed on this
>+ * function whether it was done due to direct devlink reload call or not.
>+ *
>+ * @devlink: devlink
>+ * @limit_level: reload action limit level
>+ * @actions_performed: bitmask of actions performed
>+ */
>+void devlink_reload_implicit_actions_performed(struct devlink *devlink,
>+ enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>+ unsigned long actions_performed)
What I'm a bit scarred of that the driver would call this from withing
reload_down()/up() ops. Perheps this could be WARN_ON'ed here (or in
devlink_reload())?
>+{
>+ if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
Hmm. I think that the driver does not have to support the reload and can
still be reloaded by another instance and update the stats here. Why
not?
>+ return;
>+ devlink_reload_action_stats_update(devlink, limit_level, actions_performed);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_reload_implicit_actions_performed);
>+
> static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
> enum devlink_reload_action action,
> enum devlink_reload_action_limit_level limit_level,
>- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
>+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed_out)
> {
>+ unsigned long actions_performed;
> int err;
>
> if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
>@@ -2998,9 +3045,14 @@ static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
> if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
> devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);
>
>- err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, limit_level, extack, actions_performed);
>+ err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, limit_level, extack, &actions_performed);
> devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
>- return err;
>+ if (err)
>+ return err;
>+ devlink_reload_action_stats_update(devlink, limit_level, actions_performed);
>+ if (actions_performed_out)
Just make the caller to provide valid pointer, as I suggested in the
other patch review.
>+ *actions_performed_out = actions_performed;
>+ return 0;
> }
>
> static int
>--
>2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists