linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 10/15] net/mlx5: Add support for devlink reload action fw activate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:54:42 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 10/15] net/mlx5: Add support for devlink
 reload action fw activate

Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:57AM CEST, moshe@...lanox.com wrote:

[..]

>+static void mlx5_fw_reset_complete_reload(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>+{
>+	struct mlx5_fw_reset *fw_reset = dev->priv.fw_reset;
>+
>+	/* if this is the driver that initiated the fw reset, devlink completed the reload */
>+	if (test_bit(MLX5_FW_RESET_FLAGS_PENDING_COMP, &fw_reset->reset_flags)) {
>+		complete(&fw_reset->done);
>+	} else {
>+		mlx5_load_one(dev, false);
>+		devlink_reload_implicit_actions_performed(priv_to_devlink(dev),
>+							  DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_LIMIT_LEVEL_NONE,
>+							  BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
>+							  BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE));

Hmm, who originated the reset? Devlink_reload of the same devlink
instance?

[..]