linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] mm: memcontrol: Add the missing numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:18:52 +0800
From:   Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
CC:     <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        <corbet@....net>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] mm: memcontrol: Add the missing
 numa_stat interface for cgroup v2

On 2020/9/14 11:10, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:09 AM Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name> wrote:
>>
>> Muchun Song writes:
>>> In the cgroup v1, we have a numa_stat interface. This is useful for
>>> providing visibility into the numa locality information within an
>>> memcg since the pages are allowed to be allocated from any physical
>>> node. One of the use cases is evaluating application performance by
>>> combining this information with the application's CPU allocation.
>>> But the cgroup v2 does not. So this patch adds the missing information.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> This is a feature patch, why does this have LKP's Reported-by?
> 
> In the v2 version, the kernel test robot reported a compiler error
> on the powerpc architecture. So I added that. Thanks.
> 

You should remove this reported-by, and then add v2->v3 changelog:

...original changelog...

v3:
- fixed something reported by test rebot