linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/memcg: Simplify mem_cgroup_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200914144739.GV16999@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:47:39 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/memcg: Simplify mem_cgroup_get_max()

On Mon 14-09-20 10:19:55, Waiman Long wrote:
> The mem_cgroup_get_max() function used to get memory+swap max from
> both the v1 memsw and v2 memory+swap page counters & return the maximum
> of these 2 values. This is redundant and it is more efficient to just
> get either the v1 or the v2 values depending on which one is currently
> in use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 8c74f1200261..2331d4bc7c4d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1633,17 +1633,19 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>   */
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> -	unsigned long max;
> -
> -	max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> -	if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) {
> -		unsigned long memsw_max;
> -		unsigned long swap_max;
> -
> -		memsw_max = memcg->memsw.max;
> -		swap_max = READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> -		swap_max = min(swap_max, (unsigned long)total_swap_pages);
> -		max = min(max + swap_max, memsw_max);
> +	unsigned long max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> +
> +	if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) {
> +		if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg))
> +			max += min(READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max),
> +				   (unsigned long)total_swap_pages);
> +	} else { /* v1 */
> +		if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) {
> +			unsigned long memsw = READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.max);
> +
> +			if (memsw > max)
> +				max += min(memsw - max, (unsigned long)total_swap_pages);

Yes this looks better. But, memsw can never be smaller than the hard
limit (mem_cgroup_resize_max). I would find it slightly easier to
understand if you did
	/* calculate swap excess capacity from memsw limit*/
	unsigned long memsw = READ_ONCE(memcg->memsw.max) - max;
	max += min (memsw, total_swap_pages);


> +		}
>  	}
>  	return max;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.18.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs