[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009141715350.17999@felia>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks
consistent
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> AFAICT the linux-mediatek list isn't configured to automatically
> moderate messages from non-subscribers. Its generic_nonmember_action
> setting is 'Accept'. That is the default setting for lists on
> infradead.org and I strongly encourage list maintainers to leave it
> that way.
>
> Lukas, I don't see your address in the allowlist either.
>
> There are other reasons why some messages get might trapped for
> moderation — the message size, number of recipients, spam score, etc.
>
> The mere fact that *some* messages are moderated does not mean that the
> list is "moderated for non-subscribers" in the sense that the
> MAINTAINERS file lists.
>
> > Bjorn, with that confirmation and Reviewed-by from Matthias, could you
> > please pick this patch?
>
> I think we should be fixing the ones that *do* say it's moderated for
> non-subscribers, not the one that correctly didn't :)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists