lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:17:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>, Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, David Woodhouse wrote: > > AFAICT the linux-mediatek list isn't configured to automatically > moderate messages from non-subscribers. Its generic_nonmember_action > setting is 'Accept'. That is the default setting for lists on > infradead.org and I strongly encourage list maintainers to leave it > that way. > > Lukas, I don't see your address in the allowlist either. > > There are other reasons why some messages get might trapped for > moderation — the message size, number of recipients, spam score, etc. > > The mere fact that *some* messages are moderated does not mean that the > list is "moderated for non-subscribers" in the sense that the > MAINTAINERS file lists. > > > Bjorn, with that confirmation and Reviewed-by from Matthias, could you > > please pick this patch? > > I think we should be fixing the ones that *do* say it's moderated for > non-subscribers, not the one that correctly didn't :) >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists