| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200914153024.GC680@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:30:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cper, apei, mce: Pass x86 CPER through the MCA
handling chain
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 06:45:30PM -0500, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> Linux Kernel uses ACPI Boot Error Record Table (BERT) to report fatal
> errors that occurred in a previous boot. The MCA errors in the BERT are
> reported using the x86 Processor Error Common Platform Error Record (CPER)
> format. Currently, the record prints out the raw MSR values and AMD relies
> on the raw record to provide MCA information.
>
> Extract the raw MSR values of MCA registers from the BERT and feed it into
> the standard mce_log() function through the existing x86/MCA RAS
> infrastructure. This will result in better decoding from the EDAC MCE
> decoder or the default notifier.
>
> The implementation is SMCA specific as the raw MCA register values are
> given in the register offset order of the MCAX address space.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
What's that Reported-by for?
Pls put in [] brackets over it what the 0day robot has reported.
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
> ---
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200828203332.11129-2-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com
>
> v3:
> Moved arch specific declarations from generic header file to arch
> specific header file.
> Cleaned additional declarations which are unnecessary.
> Included the check for context type.
> Added a check to verify for the first MSR address in the register
> layout.
> v2:
> Fixed build error reported by kernel test robot.
> Passed struct variable as function argument instead of entire struct
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 11 +++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c | 9 +++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/firmware/efi/cper-x86.c | 10 +++++---
> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
> index c22fb55abcfd..13d60a91eaa0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
> @@ -43,3 +43,12 @@ void arch_apei_report_mem_error(int sev, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
> apei_mce_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> #endif
> }
> +
> +int arch_apei_report_x86_error(struct cper_ia_proc_ctx *ctx_info, u64 lapic_id)
> +{
> + int err = -EINVAL;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
> + err = apei_mce_report_x86_error(ctx_info, lapic_id);
> +#endif
> + return err;
> +}
Add a stub for apei_mce_report_x86_error() in
arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h, in one of the !CONFIG_X86_MCE ifdeffery
which returns -EINVAL and get rid of this ifdeffery and simply do:
return apei_mce_report_x86_error(ctx_info, lapic_id);
here.
If you wanna fix the above apei_mce_report_mem_error() too, you can do
that in a separate patch.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c
> index af8d37962586..65001d342302 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> +#define MASK_MCA_STATUS 0xC0002001
What does that mask mean? Either here or where it is used needs a
comment.
> void apei_mce_report_mem_error(int severity, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
> {
> struct mce m;
> @@ -51,6 +53,46 @@ void apei_mce_report_mem_error(int severity, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apei_mce_report_mem_error);
>
> +int apei_mce_report_x86_error(struct cper_ia_proc_ctx *ctx_info, u64 lapic_id)
> +{
> + const u64 *i_mce = ((const void *) (ctx_info + 1));
> + unsigned int cpu;
> + struct mce m;
> +
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SMCA))
If this function you're adding is SMCA-specific, then its name cannot be
as generic as it is now.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if ((ctx_info->msr_addr & MASK_MCA_STATUS) != MASK_MCA_STATUS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mce_setup(&m);
> +
> + m.extcpu = -1;
> + m.socketid = -1;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu_data(cpu).initial_apicid == lapic_id) {
I don't like that but I don't think we have a reverse mapping from LAPIC
ID to logical CPU numbers in the kernel...
> + m.extcpu = cpu;
> + m.socketid = cpu_data(m.extcpu).phys_proc_id;
m.socketid = cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + m.apicid = lapic_id;
> + m.bank = (ctx_info->msr_addr >> 4) & 0xFF;
> + m.status = *i_mce;
> + m.addr = *(i_mce + 1);
> + m.misc = *(i_mce + 2);
> + /* Skipping MCA_CONFIG */
> + m.ipid = *(i_mce + 4);
> + m.synd = *(i_mce + 5);
Is that structure after cper_ia_proc_ctx defined somewhere in the UEFI
spec so that you can cast to it directly instead of doing this ugly
pointer arithmetic?
> +
> + mce_log(&m);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apei_mce_report_x86_error);
Why is this function exported?
If "no reason", you can fix the above one too, with a separate commit.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists