[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAbR62JTHteLrSSkpqX9QuTuzTjGSYDqcZsmqv0_t_4BA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:03:23 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Improve fairness between cfs tasks
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 14:53, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:42:02PM +0200 peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:03:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > Vincent Guittot (4):
> > > sched/fair: relax constraint on task's load during load balance
> > > sched/fair: reduce minimal imbalance threshold
> > > sched/fair: minimize concurrent LBs between domain level
> > > sched/fair: reduce busy load balance interval
> >
> > I see nothing objectionable there, a little more testing can't hurt, but
> > I'm tempted to apply them.
> >
> > Phil, Mel, any chance you can run them through your respective setups?
> >
>
> Yep. I'll try to get something started today, results in a few days.
Thanks Phil
>
> These look pretty inocuous. It'll be interesting to see the effect is.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Phil
> --
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists