linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] mm: memcontrol: Add the missing numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALvZod7VH3NDwBXrY9w95pUY7DV+R-b_chBHuygmwH_bhpULkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:07:28 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: memcontrol: Add the missing numa_stat interface
 for cgroup v2

On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 12:01 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> In the cgroup v1, we have a numa_stat interface. This is useful for
> providing visibility into the numa locality information within an
> memcg since the pages are allowed to be allocated from any physical
> node. One of the use cases is evaluating application performance by
> combining this information with the application's CPU allocation.
> But the cgroup v2 does not. So this patch adds the missing information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static struct numa_stat numa_stats[] = {
> +       { "anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ANON_MAPPED },
> +       { "file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_PAGES },
> +       { "kernel_stack", 1024, NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB },
> +       { "shmem", PAGE_SIZE, NR_SHMEM },
> +       { "file_mapped", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_MAPPED },
> +       { "file_dirty", PAGE_SIZE, NR_FILE_DIRTY },
> +       { "file_writeback", PAGE_SIZE, NR_WRITEBACK },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +       /*
> +        * The ratio will be initialized in numa_stats_init(). Because
> +        * on some architectures, the macro of HPAGE_PMD_SIZE is not
> +        * constant(e.g. powerpc).
> +        */
> +       { "anon_thp", 0, NR_ANON_THPS },
> +#endif
> +       { "inactive_anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_INACTIVE_ANON },
> +       { "active_anon", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ACTIVE_ANON },
> +       { "inactive_file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_INACTIVE_FILE },
> +       { "active_file", PAGE_SIZE, NR_ACTIVE_FILE },
> +       { "unevictable", PAGE_SIZE, NR_UNEVICTABLE },
> +       { "slab_reclaimable", 1, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B },
> +       { "slab_unreclaimable", 1, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init numa_stats_init(void)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(numa_stats); i++) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +               if (numa_stats[i].idx == NR_ANON_THPS)
> +                       numa_stats[i].ratio = HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> +#endif
> +       }

The for loop seems excessive but I don't really have a good alternative.

> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +pure_initcall(numa_stats_init);
> +
> +static unsigned long memcg_node_page_state(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +                                          unsigned int nid,
> +                                          enum node_stat_item idx)
> +{
> +       VM_BUG_ON(nid >= nr_node_ids);
> +       return lruvec_page_state(mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(nid)), idx);
> +}
> +
> +static const char *memory_numa_stat_format(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       struct seq_buf s;
> +
> +       /* Reserve a byte for the trailing null */
> +       seq_buf_init(&s, kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL), PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +       if (!s.buffer)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(numa_stats); i++) {
> +               int nid;
> +
> +               seq_buf_printf(&s, "%s", numa_stats[i].name);
> +               for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
> +                       u64 size;
> +
> +                       size = memcg_node_page_state(memcg, nid,
> +                                                    numa_stats[i].idx);
> +                       size *= numa_stats[i].ratio;
> +                       seq_buf_printf(&s, " N%d=%llu", nid, size);
> +               }
> +               seq_buf_putc(&s, '\n');
> +       }
> +
> +       /* The above should easily fit into one page */
> +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(seq_buf_putc(&s, '\0')))
> +               s.buffer[PAGE_SIZE - 1] = '\0';

I think you should follow Michal's recommendation at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200914115724.GO16999@dhcp22.suse.cz