[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9f513eef618b6e72a088cc8b2787496f190d1c2d.1600203307.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:55:58 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/smap: Fix the smap_save() asm
The old smap_save() code was:
pushf
pop %0
with %0 defined by an "=rm" constraint. This is fine if the
compiler picked the register option, but it was incorrect with an
%rsp-relative memory operand. With some intentional abuse, I can
get both gcc and clang to generate code along these lines:
pushfq
popq 0x8(%rsp)
mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
which is incorrect and will not work as intended.
Fix it by removing the memory option. This issue is exacerbated by
a clang optimization bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Fixes: e74deb11931f ("x86/uaccess: Introduce user_access_{save,restore}()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com> # I think
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h
index 8b58d6975d5d..be6d675ae3ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long smap_save(void)
ALTERNATIVE("jmp 1f", "", X86_FEATURE_SMAP)
"pushf; pop %0; " __ASM_CLAC "\n\t"
"1:"
- : "=rm" (flags) : : "memory", "cc");
+ : "=r" (flags) : : "memory", "cc");
return flags;
}
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists