linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: example: Extend based on practice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200915202837.GA2453633@bogus>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:28:37 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: example: Extend based on practice

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:47:06 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Extend the example schema with common rules which seems to be not that
> obvious:
> 1. Expecting arrays of phandles to be always ordered, regardless if
>    "xxx-names" is provided (e.g. clocks),
> 2. Add example of altering a property based on presence of other
>    property,
> 3. Document usage of unevaluatedProperties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml   | 33 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks!

I keep meaning to go work on improving this...