[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200915211354.GA2469362@bogus>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:13:54 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@...iatek.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] irqchip: Hybrid probing
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 01:51:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> A recent attempt at converting a couple of interrupt controllers from
> early probing to standard platform drivers have badly failed, as it
> became evident that although an interrupt controller can easily probe
> late, device drivers for the endpoints connected to it are rarely
> equipped to deal with probe deferral. Changes were swiftly reverted.
>
> However, there is some value in *optionally* enabling this, if only
> for development purposes, as there is otherwise a "chicken and egg"
> problem, and a few people (cc'd) are working on a potential solution.
>
> This short series enables the infrastructure for modular building
> whilst retaining the usual early probing for monolithic build, and
> introduces it to the three drivers that were previously made to probe
> as platform drivers.
I hardly expected more OF_DECLARE macros when I opened this up. Given
desires to get rid of them, I don't think adding to it is the way
forward. That wrapping a platform driver around OF_DECLARE looks pretty
horrible IMO.
I browsed some of the discussion around this. It didn't seem like it's
a large number of drivers that have to be fixed to defer probe
correctly. Am I missing something?
I'd rather keep the pressure on getting fw_devlink on by default.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists