lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200915150929.GA19770@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:09:29 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:40:39AM -0400, Thomas Tai wrote:
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
>> @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
>>   {
>>   	dma_addr_t end = addr + size - 1;
>>   -	if (!dev->dma_mask)
>> -		return false;
>> -
>
> I am concerned that some drivers may rely on this NULL checking. Would you 
> think we can keep this checking and use the following WARN_ON_ONCE()?

dma_capable is not a helper for drivers, but just for dma-direct
and related code.  And this patch adds the checks for the three
places how we call into the ->map* methods.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ