[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200915140656.845354345@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:12:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 067/177] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd
From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
[ Upstream commit f97c04c316d8fea16dca449fdfbe101fbdfee6a2 ]
When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 9642971e89cea..4578547659839 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
if (rc) {
WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
- return rc;
+ goto free_skb_resp;
}
rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists