linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 049/177] seccomp: dont leak memory when filter install races

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:12:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+3ad9614a12f80994c32e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 049/177] seccomp: dont leak memory when filter install races

From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>

[ Upstream commit a566a9012acd7c9a4be7e30dc7acb7a811ec2260 ]

In seccomp_set_mode_filter() with TSYNC | NEW_LISTENER, we first initialize
the listener fd, then check to see if we can actually use it later in
seccomp_may_assign_mode(), which can fail if anyone else in our thread
group has installed a filter and caused some divergence. If we can't, we
partially clean up the newly allocated file: we put the fd, put the file,
but don't actually clean up the *memory* that was allocated at
filter->notif. Let's clean that up too.

To accomplish this, let's hoist the actual "detach a notifier from a
filter" code to its own helper out of seccomp_notify_release(), so that in
case anyone adds stuff to init_listener(), they only have to add the
cleanup code in one spot. This does a bit of extra locking and such on the
failure path when the filter is not attached, but it's a slow failure path
anyway.

Fixes: 51891498f2da ("seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together")
Reported-by: syzbot+3ad9614a12f80994c32e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902014017.934315-1-tycho@tycho.pizza
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index c461ba9925136..54cf84bac3c9b 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -997,13 +997,12 @@ out:
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
-static int seccomp_notify_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+static void seccomp_notify_detach(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
 {
-	struct seccomp_filter *filter = file->private_data;
 	struct seccomp_knotif *knotif;
 
 	if (!filter)
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&filter->notify_lock);
 
@@ -1025,6 +1024,13 @@ static int seccomp_notify_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	kfree(filter->notif);
 	filter->notif = NULL;
 	mutex_unlock(&filter->notify_lock);
+}
+
+static int seccomp_notify_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	struct seccomp_filter *filter = file->private_data;
+
+	seccomp_notify_detach(filter);
 	__put_seccomp_filter(filter);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1358,6 +1364,7 @@ out_put_fd:
 			listener_f->private_data = NULL;
 			fput(listener_f);
 			put_unused_fd(listener);
+			seccomp_notify_detach(prepared);
 		} else {
 			fd_install(listener, listener_f);
 			ret = listener;
-- 
2.25.1