linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/14] block: lift setting the readahead size into the block layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:05:22 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, drbd-dev@...n.linbit.com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] block: lift setting the readahead size into the
 block layer

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:15:41PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I'll move it to blk_register_queue, which should work just fine.
> 
> That'll work for initial DM table load as part of DM device creation
> (dm_setup_md_queue).  But it won't account for DM table reloads that
> might change underlying devices on a live DM device (done using
> __bind).
> 
> Both dm_setup_md_queue() and __bind() call dm_table_set_restrictions()
> to set/update queue_limits.  It feels like __bind() will need to call a
> new block helper to set/update parts of queue_limits (e.g. ra_pages and
> io_pages).
> 
> Any chance you're open to factoring out that block function as an
> exported symbol for use by blk_register_queue() and code like DM's
> __bind()?

I agree with the problem statement.  OTOH adding an exported helper
for two trivial assignments seems a little silly..

For now I'll just keep the open coded ->io_pages assignment in
dm.  Note that dm doesn't currently update the ->ra_pages value
based on the underlying devices, so an incremental patch to do that
might be useful as well.