| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200915092720.0000173b@Huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:27:20 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
CC: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Jia He <justin.he@....com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init
function name to be generic
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:32:41 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:32 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> > > name to indicate that generic implementation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> >
> > A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
> > at than anything important.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++--
> > > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> > >
> > > node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> > > }
> > > -
> > > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > -{
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > - ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > > - return ret;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > > -}
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > > max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> > > min_low_pfn = min;
> > >
> > > - arm64_numa_init();
> > > + arch_numa_init();
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > > + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > > * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> > > * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> > > */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > > #include <asm/acpi.h>
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
> > and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.
> >
>
> Sure. will do that.
>
> > > #include <asm/sections.h>
> > >
> > > struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = acpi_numa_init();
> >
> > I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
> > as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
> > and srat_disabled()
> >
>
> I guess you mean adding a stub in acpi.h and acpi_numa.h ?
> As it would touch x86 related code as well, I think it is better to do
> it as a followup
> series when we try to unify x86 numa code as well (at least some part of it) ?
It would only affect x86 not using ACPI.
If that happened, you wouldn't expect it to current call these stubs anyway.
Sure, can leave it for later.
Jonathan
>
> > At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.
> >
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > > +}
> > > +#else
> > > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > > *
> > > * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> > > * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> > > */
> > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> > > +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> > > {
> > > if (!numa_off) {
> > > - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> > > + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> > > return;
> > > if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> > > return;
> > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> > > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> > > +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> > > int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> > > void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> > > void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> > > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > > static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > > static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > > static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> > > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> > > static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> > >
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists