[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200915085926.GA122937@VM20190228-100.tbsite.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:59:26 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, baolin.wang7@...il.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some improvements for blk-throttle
Hi Jens,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 07:37:53PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/7/20 2:10 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This patch set did some clean-ups, as well as removing some unnecessary
> > bps/iops limitation calculation when checking if can dispatch a bio or
> > not for a tg. Please help to review. Thanks.
> >
> > Baolin Wang (5):
> > blk-throttle: Fix some comments' typos
> > blk-throttle: Use readable READ/WRITE macros
> > blk-throttle: Define readable macros instead of static variables
> > blk-throttle: Avoid calculating bps/iops limitation repeatedly
> > blk-throttle: Avoid checking bps/iops limitation if bps or iops is
> > unlimited
> >
> > block/blk-throttle.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> Looks reasonable to me, I've applied it.
Thanks.
>
> Out of curiosity, are you using blk-throttle in production, or are these
> just fixes/cleanups that you came across?
Yes, we're using it in some old products, and I am trying to do some
cleanups and optimizaiton when testing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists