linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: mediatek: Fix generic definitions for bus frequencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1600133066.25719.9.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:24:26 +0800
From:   Qii Wang <qii.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mediatek: Fix generic definitions for bus
 frequencies

On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 15:48 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 9:02 AM <qii.wang@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Qii Wang <qii.wang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > The master code needs to being sent when the speed is more than
> > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ instead of
> > I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ. Fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qii Wang <qii.wang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > index efc1404..0cbdfbe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c
> > @@ -681,8 +681,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int clk_src,
> >         unsigned int cnt_mul;
> >         int ret = -EINVAL;
> >
> > -       if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ)
> > -               target_speed = I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ;
> > +       if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ)
> > +               target_speed = I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ;
> 
> Thanks for fixing this. Indeed, somehow I messed these up.
> 
> >
> >         max_step_cnt = mtk_i2c_max_step_cnt(target_speed);
> >         base_step_cnt = max_step_cnt;
> > @@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int parent_clk)
> >         for (clk_div = 1; clk_div <= max_clk_div; clk_div++) {
> >                 clk_src = parent_clk / clk_div;
> >
> > -               if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ) {
> > +               if (target_speed > I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ) {
> 
> But this one is not related. Original code used to have
> 
> #define MAX_FS_MODE_SPEED              400000
> 
>        if (target_speed > MAX_FS_MODE_SPEED) {
> 
> And this change doesn't fix the above mentioned problem.
> 
> So, please split into two separate changes.
> 

ok, Thank you for your comments

> >                         /* Set master code speed register */
> >                         ret = mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(i2c, clk_src,
> >                                                       I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ,
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> 
> 
>