[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200915151837.GC478@uller>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:18:37 +0000
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ohad@...ery.com,
rishabhb@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request
On Tue 15 Sep 07:34 UTC 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Currently the coredump debugfs entry takes in "disable" to set the
> coredump state to "disabled". Let's just accept the expected state
> instead.
>
I like this patch, but rather than arguing that it should match the name
of the internal state I think you should either argue that when read you
get "disabled" back or that "disabled" would make it consistent with the
recovery.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Fixes: 3afdc59e43904 ("remoteproc: Add coredump debugfs entry")
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> index 2e3b3e22e1d01..7ca823f6aa638 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t rproc_coredump_write(struct file *filp,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (!strncmp(buf, "disable", count)) {
> + if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", count)) {
> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_DISABLED;
> } else if (!strncmp(buf, "inline", count)) {
> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_INLINE;
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists