[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916131702.GB5316@myrica>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:17:02 +0200
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@...hat.com>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
ardb@...nel.org, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: bpf: Fix branch offset in JIT
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:39:37PM +0300, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
> If you start to amend extables, could you consider a change like
>
> 05a68e892e89 ("s390/kernel: expand exception table logic to allow new handling options")
>
> and implementation of BPF_PROBE_MEM then?
Commit 800834285361 ("bpf, arm64: Add BPF exception tables") should have
taken care of that, no?
Thanks,
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists