[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200916184528.498184-8-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:45:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net, paulmck@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, josh@...htriplett.org, peterz@...radead.org,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/7] rcu: prevent RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() from swallowing the condition
We run into a unused variable warning in bridge code when
variable is only used inside the condition of
rcu_dereference_protected().
#define mlock_dereference(X, br) \
rcu_dereference_protected(X, lockdep_is_held(&br->multicast_lock))
Since on builds with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=n rcu_dereference_protected()
compiles to nothing the compiler doesn't see the variable use.
Prevent the warning by adding the condition as dead code.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
--
CC: paulmck@...nel.org
CC: josh@...htriplett.org
CC: rostedt@...dmis.org
CC: mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
CC: joel@...lfernandes.org
CC: jiangshanlai@...il.com
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 53f9648cb982..50d45781fa99 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
-#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0)
+#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0 && (c))
#define rcu_sleep_check() do { } while (0)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists