lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916151021.GS720847@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:10:21 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/26] perf tools: Synthesize modules with mmap3

Em Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:17:00PM +0200, peterz@...radead.org escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:07:44AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:20:18AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> 
> > > > IIRC BUILD_ID_SIZE is 20 bytes which is the correct size for SHA-1. A
> > > > build ID may be 128-bits (16 bytes) if md5 or uuid hashes are used.
> > > > Should this test just be "> 0" ?
> > > 
> > > ah right, will check on that
> > 
> > And how do you deal with this in the kernel? I.e. to inform userspace,
> > via the PERF_RECORD_MMAP3 (or MMAP2 with that misc bit trick) the size
> > of the build-id?
> 
> The union size is 24 bytes, so there's plenty space to store a length
> field with the buildid.

So, I think we should instead use a bit in the misc field, stating the
kind of build-id, so that we don't waste a byte for that, I think.

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ