linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] edac,ghes,cper: Add Row Extension to Memory Error Record

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXE6PKb==h_154hRKwZLr3Ek+4z4A8FdTHx=co18ww5d3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:09:36 +0300
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Alex Kluver <alex.kluver@....com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        mchehab@...nel.org, russ.anderson@....com,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        kluveralex@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] edac,ghes,cper: Add Row Extension to Memory Error Record

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 20:19, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:12:31PM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Boris - do you anticipate any conflicts? If so, please take these via
> > the EDAC tree - the CPER code is mostly self contained so I don't
> > expect any conflicts with the EFI tree in that case.
>
> None so far, and I applied them for testing ontop of my EDAC queue for
> 5.10 so it should be all good. But if you want me, I can test-merge your
> branch once ready, just in case...
>

I managed to apply these patches by using a different base and
cherrypicking them into efi/next

I expect to send out a couple of PRs tomorrow, once the bots have had
a go at building the branches. In the meantime, you can take a look at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git next