lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:45:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
        Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark linux-samsung-soc list non-moderated



On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:13:53AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > In fifteen entries mentioning linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org in
> > MAINTAINERS, seven entries mention the list being moderated for
> > non-subscribers and eight entries do not. Clearly only one can be right,
> > though.
> > 
> > Joe Perches suggested that all vger.kernel.org are not moderated for
> > non-subscribers.
> > 
> > Remove all the remarks from the entries following Joe's suggestion.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/da6f30896a8fd78635b3ca454d77a5292a9aa76d.camel@perches.com/
> > Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> > ---
> > applies cleanly on v5.9-rc5 and next-20200911
> > 
> > Krzysztof, please pick this minor non-urgent cleanup patch.
> > 
> > This patch submission will also show me if linux-samsung-soc is moderated
> > or not. I have not subscribed to linux-samsung-soc and if it shows up
> > quickly in the archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence,
> > validating the patch.
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl (for example on files in modified
> maintainers section) to get the addresses of people.  This mail missed
> all my filters and got archived immediately because you sent it to
> unusual address (how did you get this address, BTW? It does not appear
> in the sources since few years).
>

Sorry, I usually do use ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl and you are right 
there is no way one could pick up that email address from the repository.

It was difficult to recall where I got the address from, but then I 
finally remembered.

I wanted to know who is responsible for the linus-samsung-soc mailing 
list for this patch. So I went to:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-samsung-soc/

And there in 'About this project', it still lists your gmail address. I 
did not crosscheck that mail address with .mailmap, get_maintainers.pl 
etc., but just send the patch out.

> Thanks, applied.

I am happy it reached you despite this mess-up on my side.

Lukas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists