linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: zstd: Switch to the zstd-1.4.6 API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:46:18 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Nick Terrell <nickrterrell@...il.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, Petr Malat <oss@...at.biz>,
        Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...com>,
        Niket Agarwal <niketa@...com>, Yann Collet <cyan@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: zstd: Switch to the zstd-1.4.6 API

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:43:04AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Otherwise we just end up with drift and kernel-specific bugs that are harder
> to debug.  To the extent those APIs make us contort the kernel code, I???m
> sure Nick is interested in improving things in both places.

Seriously, we do not care elsewhere.  Why would zlib be any different?

> There are probably 1000 constructive ways to have that conversation.  Please
> choose one of those instead of being an asshole.

I think you are the asshole here by ignoring the practices we are using
elsewhere and think your employers pet project is somehow special.  It
is not, and claiming so is everything but constructive.