linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] ath10k: sdio: remove redundant check in for loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200916165748.20927-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:57:49 +0100
From:   Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ath10k: sdio: remove redundant check in for loop

The for loop checks whether cur_section is NULL on every iteration, but
we know it can never be NULL as there is another check towards the
bottom of the loop body. Refactor to avoid this unnecessary check.

Also, increment the variable i inline for clarity

Addresses-Coverity: 1496984 ("Null pointer dereferences)
Suggested-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
---
v2: refactor in the manner suggested by Saeed

 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c | 12 +++---------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
index 81ddaafb6721..486886c74e6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
@@ -2307,8 +2307,8 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_dump_memory_section(struct ath10k *ar,
 	}
 
 	count = 0;
-
-	for (i = 0; cur_section; i++) {
+	i = 0;
+	for (; cur_section; cur_section = next_section) {
 		section_size = cur_section->end - cur_section->start;
 
 		if (section_size <= 0) {
@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_dump_memory_section(struct ath10k *ar,
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if ((i + 1) == mem_region->section_table.size) {
+		if (++i == mem_region->section_table.size) {
 			/* last section */
 			next_section = NULL;
 			skip_size = 0;
@@ -2361,12 +2361,6 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_dump_memory_section(struct ath10k *ar,
 		}
 
 		count += skip_size;
-
-		if (!next_section)
-			/* this was the last section */
-			break;
-
-		cur_section = next_section;
 	}
 
 	return count;
-- 
2.28.0