[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAAPnDEoQhtXuiqHwUtrsL7codcToAVwaR=+qVczZrz6RCWe0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:13:00 -0700
From: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
KarimAllah Raslan <karahmed@...zon.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: x86: VMX: Prevent MSR passthrough when MSR
access is denied
> >
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * These 2 parameters are used to config the controls for Pause-Loop Exiting:
> >> * ple_gap: upper bound on the amount of time between two successive
> >> @@ -622,6 +642,41 @@ static inline bool report_flexpriority(void)
> >> return flexpriority_enabled;
> >> }
> >
> > One thing that seems to be missing is removing MSRs from the
> > permission bitmap or resetting the permission bitmap to its original
> > state before adding changes on top of it. This would be needed on
> > subsequent calls to kvm_vm_ioctl_set_msr_filter(). When that happens
> > the original changes made by KVM_REQ_MSR_FILTER_CHANGED need to be
> > backed out before applying the new set.
>
> I'm not sure I follow. Subsequent calls to set_msr_filter() will invoke
> the "please reset the whole MSR passthrough bitmap to a consistent
> state" which will then reapply the in-kvm desired state through the
> bitmap and filter state on top on each of those.
>
Yes, you're correct. I discovered this after the fact by adding a
test to the selftest I wrote for the deny list system which I revamped
to work for your filter system. It proved the permission bitmaps are
in fact set as expected on subsequent calls. You can disregard this
comment.
As a side note, I'm happy to share the test if you'd like. I also used
it to uncover an issue in the first commit of this series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists