linux-kernel - Re: Static call dependency on libelf version?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200915141701.j5fnir63trpwqbfp@treble>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:17:01 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Mark Wielaard <mark@...mp.org>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Static call dependency on libelf version?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> But all this is for ancient versions of elfutils libelf. So it is hard
> to say and my memory might be failing. If someone can confirm 0.158
> (which is 6 years old) works fine I would pick that as minimum version,
> otherwise simply go with 0.168 which is 4 years old and should be on
> most systems by now.

I just discovered elf_version(), I assume that would allow us to check
and enforce the libelf version?

-- 
Josh