[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916115057.GO2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:50:57 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lockdep: Allow tuning tracing capacity constants.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:28:19PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:05 PM Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> >
> > Hello. Can we apply this patch?
> >
> > This patch addresses top crashers for syzbot, and applying this patch
> > will help utilizing syzbot's resource for finding other bugs.
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>
> Peter, do you still have concerns with this?
Yeah, I still hate it with a passion; it discourages thinking. A bad
annotation that blows up the lockdep storage, no worries, we'll just
increase this :/
IIRC the issue with syzbot is that the current sysfs annotation is
pretty terrible and generates a gazillion classes, and syzbot likes
poking at /sys a lot and thus floods the system.
I don't know enough about sysfs to suggest an alternative, and haven't
exactly had spare time to look into it either :/
Examples of bad annotations is getting every CPU a separate class, that
leads to nr_cpus! chains if CPUs arbitrarily nest (nr_cpus^2 if there's
only a single nesting level).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists