[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916161040.GA1066896@epycbox.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:10:40 -0700
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: hao.wu@...el.com, trix@...hat.com, mdf@...nel.org,
yilun.xu@...el.com, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] fpga: dfl: Make m10_n3000_info static
Hi Yue,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:25:36PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c:392:23: warning:
> symbol 'm10_n3000_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c
> index 5088f8f0e0cd..686813b59d33 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int n3000_nios_init_done_check(struct n3000_nios *ns)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -struct spi_board_info m10_n3000_info = {
> +static struct spi_board_info m10_n3000_info = {
> .modalias = "m10-n3000",
> .max_speed_hz = 12500000,
> .bus_num = 0,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Can you resend this with a [PATCH v2] or [PATCH v2 next], neither
lore nor patchwork picks it up in its current form.
This'll make sure it doesn't get lost.
While at it could you change the first line to:
"fpga: dfl: n3000-nios: Make m10_n3000_info static"
Thanks for the patch,
Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists