linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for MCP25XXFD SPI-CAN Network driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <277ce2a5-b8fc-46f3-6695-4be445d52927@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:59:37 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        wg@...ndegger.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        o.rempel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for MCP25XXFD SPI-CAN Network driver

On 9/16/20 6:07 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Just a quick question: I don't see any activity on this specific driver for
>>> sometime (back in Martin days itself). Is it due to lack of reviewers or
>>> it is due to the patch size (lines of code) so that nobody is interested
>>> in reviewing?
>>
>> If you look around, there are currently several versions of mcp251x
>> driver around, shipped by hardware vendors who glue the chip on there
>> SOM etc.
>> Until something more-or-less clean becomes mainline, the effort remains
>> spread.
>>
>> A problem to import a complete driver is that ... its complete.
>> There was an suggestion to split into several patches, but that does not
>> really affect the review work.
>>
>> The original driver failed to initialize under a loaded CAN bus, on my
>> desk. The current driver is more cleanly written than the original
>> and it seems to survive more than 1 use case (although I have a MAB overflow
>> report pending to investigate).
>> So, this is a good candidate for mainline.
> 
> I just saw that you've pushed these patches to your testing branch. Does this
> mean that you're going to include it in v5.10 PR?

yes, that's the plan.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)