linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v37 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control hardware bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200916155702.GA21026@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:57:02 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v37 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch
 Control hardware bits

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:57:16PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:38:26AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > Hi Jarko,
> > > > 
> > > > It looks like some of the patches weren't delivered to the lists.
> > > > Patches 0, 1, 8, 9, and 17 seem to be missing.
> > > > 
> > > > Lore agrees with me:
> > > > 
> > > >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20200911124019.42178-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com/
> > > 
> > > And my first email to you bounced, similar to an email I tried sending
> > > to Kristen a few weeks ago.  Something weird going on with Intel mail
> > > servers?
> > 
> > Possible. I don't honestly know what is going on.
> > 
> > At least now all the patches are out:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/
> > 
> > Not sure if a resend would make sense for the full patch set but maybe I
> > just do quick iteration and send v38 soon. And just in case use some alt
> > smtp server.
> 
> I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the
> original thread.  v38 has some missing patches as well.

Now, v38 is there as complete but it has a duplicate version (they have
exact same contents). Through the alternative mail server it just took
hours to get them to LKML so I did another git send-email :-(

Anyway, there is no difference between the patch sets marked as v38.

> 
> -- 
> Josh
> 

/Jarkko