[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2009161512540.16902@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:13:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Mark Brown wrote:
> This series updates the arm64 stacktrace code to use the newer and much
> simpler arch_stack_walk() interface, the main benefit being a single
> entry point to the arch code with no need for the arch code to worry
> about skipping frames. Along the way I noticed that the reliable
> parameter to the arch_stack_walk() callback appears to be redundant
> so there's also a patch here removing that from the existing code to
> simplify the interface.
>
> This is preparatory work for implementing reliable stack trace for
> arm64.
>
> v3:
> - Rebase onto v5.9-rc3.
> - Fix handling of task == current.
> - Flip the sense of the walk_stackframe() callback.
> v2:
> - Rebase onto v5.9-rc1.
>
> Mark Brown (3):
> stacktrace: Remove reliable argument from arch_stack_walk() callback
> arm64: stacktrace: Make stack walk callback consistent with generic
> code
> arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK
The patches look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
M
Powered by blists - more mailing lists