[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1750732498.13475000.1600261259894.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:00:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Qian Cai <caiqian@...hat.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support
----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:52:07AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is defined
> > > > at
> > > > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets expand in
> > >
> > > Bah! I hate all this :/
> > >
> > > I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> > > option.
> >
> > Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it?
>
> Did you verify it works? I only wrote it..
Yes, I did.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists