linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v37 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch Control hardware bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200915140250.kf2kgfbgzxfvmoiy@treble>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:02:50 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v37 02/24] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX Launch
 Control hardware bits

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:27:25AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I see the v37 missing patches now, but they're not threaded with the
> > original thread.
> 
> Probably because he bounced only the ones you didn't get, separately.
> 
> > v38 has some missing patches as well.
> 
> And I got them twice. Can we please stop the spamming?
> 
> And yeah, use another mail service - all those companies switching the
> o365 and mimecast, means time to move kernel development off of company
> mail because company mail simply can't handle it.

If you getting them (twice?) and vger's not, it sounds like vger is
dropping them for some reason.

-- 
Josh