[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2009150911570.8228@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
"Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@....com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@....com>,
"Tadakamadla, Rajesh (DCIG/CDI/HPS Perf)"
<rajesh.tadakamadla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] nvfs: a filesystem for persistent memory
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:34:41AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > - when the fsck.nvfs tool mmaps the device /dev/pmem0, the kernel uses
> > buffer cache for the mapping. The buffer cache slows does fsck by a factor
> > of 5 to 10. Could it be possible to change the kernel so that it maps DAX
> > based block devices directly?
>
> Oh, because fs/block_dev.c has:
> .mmap = generic_file_mmap,
>
> I don't see why we shouldn't have a blkdev_mmap modelled after
> ext2_file_mmap() with the corresponding blkdev_dax_vm_ops.
Yes, that's possible - and we whould also have to rewrite methods
read_iter and write_iter on DAX block devices, so that they are coherent
with mmap.
Mikulas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists