[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916004404.GE604@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:44:04 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] perf kvm: add kvm-stat for arm64
On (20/09/15 21:21), Leo Yan wrote:
> 
> Sorry if I miss anything for this.
> 
No, you are absolutely right! I should have looked more attentively.
Is "IL" good enough for a decoded reason
 	{ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ,		"IRQ"		},	\
 	{ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR,	"SERROR"	},	\
 	{ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP,		"TRAP"		},	\
+	{ARM_EXCEPTION_IL,		"IL"		}, \
 	{ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE,	"HYP_GONE"	}
or should there be "ILLEGAL", or maybe something even better?
ILLEGAL_EXC, etc.
	-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists