linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: fix exec activate_mm vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb switching race

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:26:29 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-mm \@ kvack . org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: fix exec activate_mm vs TLB shootdown and lazy tlb switching race

Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> writes:
> Excerpts from peterz@...radead.org's message of September 14, 2020 8:56 pm:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:52:16PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> Reading and modifying current->mm and current->active_mm and switching
>>> mm should be done with irqs off, to prevent races seeing an intermediate
>>> state.
...
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>> 
>> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>> 
>> I'm thinking we want this selected on x86 as well. Andy?
>
> Thanks for the ack. The plan was to take it through the powerpc tree,
> but if you'd want x86 to select it, maybe a topic branch? Although
> Michael will be away during the next merge window so I don't want to
> get too fancy. Would you mind doing it in a follow up merge after
> powerpc, being that it's (I think) a small change?

Or get akpm to take the series, including the x86 change.

cheers