| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7a86180ed7013a0a52d71cf38a4bc371c7ffd4ab.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:05:04 -0400
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@...el.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
thaytan@...aisin.net, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com>,
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@...el.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
José Roberto de Souza
<jose.souza@...el.com>, Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] drm/i915/dp: Program source OUI on eDP panels
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 15:38 -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:47:01PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 15:06 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:29:35PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > Since we're about to start adding support for Intel's magic HDR
> > > > backlight interface over DPCD, we need to ensure we're properly
> > > > programming this field so that Intel specific sink services are
> > > > exposed.
> > > > Otherwise, 0x300-0x3ff will just read zeroes.
> > > >
> > > > We also take care not to reprogram the source OUI if it already
> > > > matches
> > > > what we expect. This is just to be careful so that we don't
> > > > accidentally
> > > > take the panel out of any backlight control modes we found it in.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> > > > Cc: thaytan@...aisin.net
> > > > Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 32
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > index 4bd10456ad188..b591672ec4eab 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > @@ -3428,6 +3428,7 @@ void
> > > > intel_dp_sink_set_decompression_state(struct
> > > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > > void intel_dp_sink_dpms(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int mode)
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > > + u8 edp_oui[] = { 0x00, 0xaa, 0x01 };
> > >
> > > what are these values?
>
> We in i915 typically use the OUI number for adding any eDP specific
> quirks. I have seen these getting spit out in the dmesg log at thebeginning.
> AFAIK It is some kind of OEM identification number for a display panel.
Are you sure you're not confusing this with the sink OUI btw? We're setting
the source OUI (so, identifying ourselves to the display panel instead of the
other way around) here to tell the panel to expose the Intel specific
backlight controls. My assumption is the { 0x00, 0xaa, 0x01 } is some Intel
driver OUI, it's just I'm not really sure where it comes from other then the
patch I linked to down below
>
> Manasi
> > I wish I knew, my assumption is this is the OUI that Intel's GPU driver
> > uses on
> > other platforms, but I don't have any documentation mentioning this (in
> > fact,
> > the few documents I do have on this backlight interface don't seem to make
> > any
> > mention of it). I only managed to find this when looking through the last
> > attempt someone did at adding support for this backlight interface:
> >
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/334989/
> >
> > I think it should be fairly safe to write, as I know nouveau always
> > programs a
> > source OUI (we don't do it from our driver, but nvidia hardware seems to
> > do it
> > automatically) and I don't believe I've seen it ever change any behavior
> > besides
> > making things appear in the 0x300-0x3ff register range.
> >
> > AFAICT though, the backlight interface won't advertise itself without this
> > being
> > set early on. If you could find anyone from Intel who knows more about it
> > though
> > I'd definitely appreciate it (and just in general for the rest of the
> > patch
> > series as well)
> >
> > > > int ret, i;
> > > >
> > > > /* Should have a valid DPCD by this point */
> > > > @@ -3443,6 +3444,14 @@ void intel_dp_sink_dpms(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp,
> > > > int mode)
> > > > } else {
> > > > struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = dp_to_lspcon(intel_dp);
> > > >
> > > > + /* Write the source OUI as early as possible */
> > > > + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> > > > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > > DP_SOURCE_OUI,
> > > > edp_oui,
> > > > + sizeof(edp_oui));
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to write
> > > > eDP source
> > > > OUI\n");
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * When turning on, we need to retry for 1ms to give
> > > > the sink
> > > > * time to wake up.
> > > > @@ -4530,6 +4539,23 @@ static void intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(struct
> > > > intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void
> > > > +intel_edp_init_source_oui(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > > + u8 oui[] = { 0x00, 0xaa, 0x01 };
> > > > + u8 buf[3] = { 0 };
> > > > +
> > > > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SOURCE_OUI, buf,
> > > > sizeof(buf)) <
> > > > 0)
> > > > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to read source OUI\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + if (memcmp(oui, buf, sizeof(oui)) == 0)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SOURCE_OUI, oui,
> > > > sizeof(oui)) <
> > > > 0)
> > > > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to write source OUI\n");
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static bool
> > > > intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -4607,6 +4633,12 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > > > intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(intel_dp);
> > > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Program our source OUI so we can make various Intel-
> > > > specific AUX
> > > > + * services available (such as HDR backlight controls)
> > > > + */
> > > > + intel_edp_init_source_oui(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > I believe we should restrict this to the supported platforms: cfl, whl,
> > > cml,
> > > icl, tgl
> > > no?
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.26.2
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > --
> > Sincerely,
> > Lyude Paul (she/her)
> > Software Engineer at Red Hat
> >
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists