linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v1 10/18] x86/hyperv: implement and use hv_smp_prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87mu1rjnqv.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:14:16 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Linux on Hyper-V List <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
        Nuno Das Neves <nudasnev@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Lillian Grassin-Drake <ligrassi@...rosoft.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 10/18] x86/hyperv: implement and use hv_smp_prepare_cpus

Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> writes:

> Microsoft Hypervisor requires the root partition to make a few
> hypercalls to setup application processors before they can be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lillian Grassin-Drake <ligrassi@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
> Co-Developed-by: Lillian Grassin-Drake <ligrassi@...rosoft.com>
> Co-Developed-by: Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
> ---
> CPU hotplug and unplug is not yet supported in this setup, so those
> paths remain untouched.
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> index 1bf57d310f78..7522cae02759 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,31 @@ static void __init hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
>  	hv_init_spinlocks();
>  #endif
>  }
> +
> +static void __init hv_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)

I think it makes little sense to try to make Linux work as Hyper-V root
partition when !CONFIG_X86_64. If we still care about Hyper-V enablement
for !CONFIG_X86_64 we can probably introduce something like
CONFIG_HYPERV_ROOT and enable it automatically, e.g.

config HYPERV_ROOT
        def_bool HYPERV && X86_64

and use it instead.

> +	int i;
> +	int vp_index = 1;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	native_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);
> +
> +	for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> +		if (i == 0)
> +			continue;
> +		ret = hv_call_add_logical_proc(numa_cpu_node(i), i, cpu_physical_id(i));
> +		BUG_ON(ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> +		if (i == 0)
> +			continue;
> +		ret = hv_call_create_vp(numa_cpu_node(i), hv_current_partition_id, vp_index++, i);

So vp_index variable is needed here to make sure there are no gaps? (or
we could've just used 'i')?

> +		BUG_ON(ret);
> +	}
> +#endif
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
> @@ -359,6 +384,8 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>  
>  # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu;
> +	if (hv_root_partition)
> +		smp_ops.smp_prepare_cpus = hv_smp_prepare_cpus;
>  # endif
>  
>  	/*

-- 
Vitaly