linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:11:30 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 dma-mapping tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  mm/Kconfig

between commit:

  b7176c261cdb ("dma-contiguous: provide the ability to reserve per-numa CMA")

from the dma-mapping tree and commit:

  c999bd436fe9 ("mm/cma: make number of CMA areas dynamic, remove CONFIG_CMA_AREAS")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped