[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200915142624.GA16005@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:26:24 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:11:51AM -0400, Thomas Tai wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-09-15 10:07 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:03:14AM -0600, Thomas Tai wrote:
>>> When booting the kernel v5.9-rc4 on a VM, the kernel would panic when
>>> printing a warning message in swiotlb_map(). It is because dev->dma_mask
>>> can potentially be a null pointer. Using the dma_get_mask() macro can
>>> avoid the NULL pointer dereference.
>>
>> dma_mask must not be zero. This means drm is calling DMA API functions
>> on something weird. This needs to be fixed in the caller.
>>
>
> Thanks, Christoph for your comment. The caller already fixed the null
> pointer in the latest v5.9-rc5. I am thinking that if we had used the
> dma_get_mask(), the kernel couldn't panic and could properly print out the
> warning message.
If we want to solve this something like this patch is probably the
right way:
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
index 6e87225600ae35..064870844f06c1 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
@@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
{
dma_addr_t end = addr + size - 1;
- if (!dev->dma_mask)
- return false;
-
if (is_ram && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) &&
min(addr, end) < phys_to_dma(dev, PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn)))
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
index 0d129421e75fc8..2b01d8f7baf160 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
@@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ dma_addr_t dma_map_page_attrs(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
dma_addr_t addr;
BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->dma_mask))
+ return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
+
if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops))
addr = dma_direct_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
else
@@ -179,6 +183,10 @@ int dma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
int ents;
BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->dma_mask))
+ return 0;
+
if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops))
ents = dma_direct_map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
else
@@ -217,6 +225,9 @@ dma_addr_t dma_map_resource(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn_valid(PHYS_PFN(phys_addr))))
return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->dma_mask))
+ return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
+
if (dma_map_direct(dev, ops))
addr = dma_direct_map_resource(dev, phys_addr, size, dir, attrs);
else if (ops->map_resource)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists