[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916081225.GJ2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:12:25 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stats: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:44:15AM +0000, Xu Wang wrote:
> seq_puts is a lot cheaper than seq_printf, so use that to print
> literal strings.
performance is not a consideration here.
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> kernel/sched/stats.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/stats.c b/kernel/sched/stats.c
> index 750fb3c67eed..0818fe03407a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/stats.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/stats.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int show_schedstat(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> rq->rq_cpu_time,
> rq->rq_sched_info.run_delay, rq->rq_sched_info.pcount);
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> + seq_putc(seq, '\n');
And yet, the changelog says seq_put*s*().
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* domain-specific stats */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists