linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9] binder: transaction latency tracking for user build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200916152959.GA3020510@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:29:59 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Frankie Chang <Frankie.Chang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, Jian-Min Liu <Jian-Min.Liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] binder: transaction latency tracking for user build

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:06:45PM +0800, Frankie Chang wrote:
> Change from v9:
>   - rename timestamp to ts in binder_internal.h for conciseness.
>   - change 'struct timeval' to 'struct timespec64' in binder_internal.h.

These just blew up in the 0-day testing, again, so I'm dropping them
from my tree.

Can you please fix them up and resend when you have them properly
building?

thanks,

greg k-h