linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PHY: Prepare Cadence Torrent PHY driver to support multilink configurations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:42:13 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Swapnil Kashinath Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>
Cc:     "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Milind Parab <mparab@...ence.com>,
        Yuti Suresh Amonkar <yamonkar@...ence.com>,
        "tomi.valkeinen@...com" <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        "jsarha@...com" <jsarha@...com>, "nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PHY: Prepare Cadence Torrent PHY driver to
 support multilink configurations

Hi Swapnil,

On 08-09-20, 13:57, Swapnil Kashinath Jakhade wrote:
> > On 27-08-20, 15:28, Swapnil Jakhade wrote:
> > > Cadence Torrent PHY is a multiprotocol PHY supporting different
> > > multilink PHY configurations including DisplayPort, PCIe, USB, SGMII,
> > QSGMII etc.
> > > Existing Torrent PHY driver supports only DisplayPort. This patch
> > > series prepares Torrent PHY driver so that different multilink
> > > configurations can be supported. It also updates DT bindings
> > > accordingly. This doesn't affect ABI as Torrent PHY driver has never
> > > been functional, and therefore do not exist in any active use case.
> > >
> > > Support for different multilink configurations with register sequences
> > > for protocols above will be added in a separate patch series.
> > 
> > Series looks good to me.
> > 
> > > This patch series is dependent on PHY attributes patch series [1].
> > 
> > I did not see any obvious depends in the series, if it is not maybe good to
> > rebase and send without dependency
> > 
> 
> Sure. I will resend the series removing dependency.

I have applied the PHY attributes patch series, but dt patch has some
comments, please fix that and repost

-- 
~Vinod