lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:31:50 +0800
From:   Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek
 cpufreq HW driver

Hi, Rob sir:

Sorry to bother you, may I have your review comment for the binding
part?
Appreciated.

On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 19:39 +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> Hi, Rob sir:
> 
> Sorry to bother you, may I have your review comment for the binding
> part?
> Appreciated.
> 
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 11:04 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 10-09-20, 13:30, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 10:33 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > On 10-09-20, 12:31, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > > > The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs. 
> > > > > The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch depends on the MT6779 DTS patch submitted by Hanks Chen
> > > > >  https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/4/1094
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for hanging there. Looks good to me. I will apply it once Rob
> > > > Ack's the binding patch.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Many thanks for your help. May I know if you can add Reviewed-by tag to
> > > this patch set.
> > 
> > Since this patchset is going to get merged via my tree (ARM cpufreq
> > tree), a reviewed-by isn't required here. I will queue it up for
> > 5.10-rc1 after I receive an Ack from Rob.
> > 
> > > I would like to prepare some patches for more features
> > > based on this. Is that okay to you? Thanks again.
> > 
> > That should be fine.
> > 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ